Media Mix Modeling for Ecommerce: The Complete Guide

Marketing attribution is extremely complex, and despite what AI tools are promising, there is no silver bullet. Media mix modeling is a data-driven approach that’s really come back into style the past few years…this it the guide you need to read before investing time or money into building one.

Sean Collins

Jun 12, 2025

Media Mix Modeling for Ecommerce: The Complete Guide

A practical approach to understanding attribution beyond last-click

Marketing attribution has never been more complex. As privacy regulations tighten and cookie-based tracking becomes less reliable, ecommerce brands are rediscovering an old friend: media mix modeling (MMM). But before you jump on the bandwagon, let's be clear—MMMs aren't a silver bullet, and they're definitely not right for every brand.

What Is a Media Mix Model?

At its core, a media mix model is a way of determining how much of your sales variability is driven by your different marketing tactics. Think of it as a statistical method that helps you understand which channels and tactics are actually moving the needle on your bottom line.

From a technical standpoint, MMM uses linear regression to analyze all your different marketing activities and understand how they impact your sales over time. It's essentially an algebraic equation where you're plugging in different variables (your marketing channels) and assigning coefficients to each that represent their relative effectiveness.

Here's the key difference from other attribution methods: while tools like Google Analytics focus on individual customer journeys—tracking one specific sale back to its source—MMMs look at the aggregate picture. They're less concerned with whether a single purchase came from Facebook or Google, and more focused on understanding how your entire media mix drives overall sales variability.

The MMM Renaissance: Why Now?

MMMs aren't new. In fact, they were the standard for attribution before Google Analytics popularized last-click attribution. So why are they making a comeback?

The answer lies in the fundamental limitations of digital attribution. When someone Googles your brand name and converts, last-click attribution gives Google all the credit. But how did they hear about your brand in the first place? MMMs try to solve this puzzle by looking at the bigger picture.

As Steve puts it, traditional digital attribution can "gaslight you with your data." You get definitive-looking reports that confidently tell you exactly what drove each sale, when the reality is often much more nuanced. MMMs acknowledge this complexity upfront.

What You Need to Build an MMM

Building an effective media mix model requires specific data inputs at a granular level:

Essential Data Requirements

Sales Data: You need transaction-level sales data aggregated by day (for ecommerce). There is no reason to put it in on any other time span than by day. Could you do it by week? Sure, but why? The key is granularity—you want to see daily fluctuations that can be tied to your marketing activities.

Marketing Execution Data: This should match the granularity of your sales data. For every marketing channel, you need daily data on:

Impressions (preferred over spend)

Clicks from paid search campaigns

Podcast ad runs

Billboard timing

Any other marketing activities

Baseline Controls: You need to account for what you'd sell by doing nothing—your baseline sales level. This includes:

Seasonality patterns

Price changes

Promotional activities

Distribution channel changes

Why Impressions Beat Spend

Many MMM providers use daily spend as their primary input, but this approach has limitations. First of all, Google Search ads are billed on a PPC basis, but people can still be seeing your ad even if they aren’t clicking. Second, spend can vary due to factors outside your control—cost per impression fluctuations, unexpected bidding competition, or platform algorithm changes. Impressions give you a more direct measure of actual execution.

When you understand the effectiveness of impressions, you can calculate what you should pay for them and negotiate better rates with publishers, podcasts, and other media partners.

Why Transactions Beat Revenue

Similarly, using transactions rather than revenue as your dependent variable provides cleaner insights. Revenue is influenced by factors beyond marketing—price changes, product mix shifts, return rates. By focusing on transaction volume, you get a clearer picture of how marketing drives customer acquisition, which you can then translate into revenue impact.

The Organic Challenge

One of the trickiest aspects of MMM is handling organic activities—email marketing, social media posts, SEO, word-of-mouth. These activities often lack the variability that makes MMM effective.

If you send the same number of emails every week or maintain consistent social media posting, there's no variability for the model to analyze. In these cases, these activities are better considered part of your baseline rather than measured tactics.

For truly viral moments or significant PR hits, you can use proxy variables—website mentions, social media buzz metrics, or even simple dummy variables for specific time periods when you know something big happened.

When MMMs Work Best (And When They Don't)

MMMs thrive under specific conditions:

Ideal Scenarios:

High variability in marketing execution across channels

Fast-moving products with frequent purchases

Different tactics running at different times

Sufficient transaction volume for statistical significance

Poor Fit Scenarios:

Seasonal brands that only advertise during specific periods

High-consideration, low-frequency purchases (like luxury cars)

Always-on tactics with no variability

Insufficient transaction volume

Single channel strategies…if you’re only advertising on Meta, then you don’t need an econometric model to tell you that Meta is your ad channel

The Multi-Attribution Approach

Here's where many brands go wrong: they treat MMM as a replacement for other attribution methods. The reality is that different attribution approaches are all partially right and partially wrong. The key is using them together.

Consider a "three-legged stool" approach:

Media Mix Modeling for aggregate, cross-channel insights

Last-click attribution for immediate conversion paths

Self-reported attribution (post-purchase surveys) for customer perspective

When your MMM says Meta is 10x more effective than Google, but your last-click attribution tells a different story, that's not a contradiction—it's valuable information. Meta might be driving awareness that leads to branded Google searches, while Google captures the final conversion.

Implementation Best Practices

Start Simple

Don't throw every data point you have into the model. Focus on tactics where you have clear variability and logical connections to sales. Over-specification can lead to spurious correlations (like the famous example of pool drownings correlating with Nicolas Cage movie releases).

Regular Updates

MMMs aren't "set it and forget it" tools. Plan to update your model quarterly or bi-annually as your business evolves, new tactics are introduced, and market conditions change. Some platforms and teams will re-run your model daily or weekly…we don’t think that’s really necessary.

You can leverage in-platform reporting to understand the tactical updates to make, to figure out which creative is/isn’t working.

Think of your MMM as more of a strategic lever. Update it quarterly or semi-annually, and use that as the point in time to re-visit your strategy. Then spend 3-6 months executing that strategy.

Validate Outputs

Always sanity-check your results. If your MMM suggests a conversion rate that seems impossibly high or low, investigate what might be causing the model to reach that conclusion.

Business Intuition Matters

The model is a tool, not a replacement for strategic thinking. Use business logic to interpret results and guide model refinements. Data should be a directional guide, but it in no way should be viewed as a replacement for great marketing or great marketers.

A MMM is going to show you directionally what is/isn’t working…it’s still up to you to decide if poor performance means you should abandon a channel or adjust your approach (for example).

The Time Factor

For ecommerce brands, MMMs typically work well because purchases happen relatively quickly after exposure to marketing. The model can capture sales that occur within days of marketing exposure, which aligns with how most ecommerce attribution windows work (typically 7 days).

For longer consideration cycles, MMMs become more challenging but not impossible. You might need to model earlier funnel actions (lead signups, demo requests) while being very careful about the assumptions you make regarding conversion rates from those actions to final sales.

And by longer consideration, we don’t mean beyond 7 days…we mean months. A buying cycle under 90 days should be fine.

Is MMM Right for Your Brand?

Not every ecommerce brand needs a media mix model. Consider MMM if you:

Run multiple marketing channels with varying spend levels

Have sufficient transaction volume for statistical analysis

Need to make budget allocation decisions across channels

Want to understand cross-channel interactions

Have variability in your marketing execution

Are investing or planning to invest in brand marketing

Are using or considering using non-digital channels (direct mail, out of home, even podcasts)

Are spending a lot in low-click ads like programmatic or display

Skip MMM if you:

Are a very seasonal business with limited advertising periods

Have low transaction volume or very long sales cycles

Run consistent, always-on marketing with little variability

Need individual customer-level attribution insights

Are putting nearly all of your marketing spend into a single channel (usually Meta, but could be Google, TikTok, or whatever)

The Bottom Line

Media mix modeling is experiencing a renaissance for good reason. As digital attribution becomes less reliable and privacy regulations tighten, MMMs offer a valuable perspective on marketing effectiveness. But they're not magic—they're statistical tools that require the right data, regular maintenance, and careful interpretation.

The brands that succeed with MMM treat it as one component of a comprehensive attribution strategy, not a standalone solution. Used correctly, MMMs can provide crucial insights for budget allocation, channel effectiveness, and strategic planning. Used incorrectly, they can lead you down expensive rabbit holes based on statistical artifacts.

Before investing in MMM, honestly assess whether your business has the variability, volume, and complexity that makes this approach valuable. If you do, MMM can be a powerful addition to your marketing toolkit. If you don't, your time and resources might be better spent on other attribution and optimization approaches.

Ready to explore media mix modeling for your brand? Let’s chat to see if now is the right time for you & your brand.

Beyond the Sale Spike: Understanding the True Impact of Promotions on Your Ecommerce Revenue

Sean Collins